I’ll See Your LOL and Raise You an Emoticon…

Recently I’ve been thinking about how passive agressive people can be online. Or more specifically, via e-mail. Since tone must be inferred, you can get away with saying something insulting, offensive or baiting, and then qualify it with a universal symbol.

In general, I’ve avoided all of the texting jargon (mainly because I’m old) and I flat out loathe emoticons. Since they are widely used and should be incorporated into dictionaries and thesauruses any day now…

********************************************
Can’t you see it?

happy

Part of Speech: adjective

Definition: in high spirits; satisfied

Synonyms: :-), :O), B-), :->, =>, blessed, blest, blissful, blithe, can’t complain, captivated, cheerful, chipper, chirpy, content, contented, convivial, delighted, ecstatic, elated, exultant, flying high, gay, glad, gleeful, gratified, intoxicated, jolly, joyful, joyous, jubilant, laughing, light, lively, looking good, merry, mirthful, on cloud nine*, overjoyed, peaceful, peppy, perky, playful, pleasant, pleased, sparkling, sunny, thrilled, tickled, tickled pink*, up, upbeat, walking on air

Antonyms: :-(, :'(, depressed, discouraged, dissatisfied, miserable, morose, pained, sad, sorrowful, unhappy

********************************************
…I’m pretty used to them. But I’ve never been able to “go there.” Maybe because they seemed too cutesy to me? Anyway – the only time I will use an emoticon is when I worry that something I write might be up for interpretation and need to be VERY clear about tone.

But a truly manipulative person can definitely abuse these little shortcuts. For example, I have a friend who once received an e-mail from a family member that included the following:

“But ever since you had kids, you’ve been really good about acknowledging birthdays.”

Now – that seems like a dig to me. Am I wrong, or does it imply that she was previously remiss in acknowledging birthdays? It’s already kind of confusing, but that’s easily exaccerbated with an emoticon!

But ever since you had kids, you’ve been really good about acknowledging birthdays. :)”

In theory, that little smiley face certainly takes the edge off. I mean I would have thought that was a bitchy thing to say, but slap on some creative punctuation and it’s all good.

This statement could also be made “nice” with a little humor:

“But ever since you had kids, you’ve been really good about acknowledging birthdays. LOL”

The “laugh” immediately tells the recipient that they are in on the joke. As in, “aren’t you a hoot – you birthday forgetting rascal you!”

But the more likely scenario is that the recipient still feels the full impact of that snarky little comment and is just further enraged by the passive agressive add on.

This kind of e-mail exchange could go downhill very quickly.

Based on the real life example above, I have written a fictional e-mail conversation between “Jane” and her sister “Alice.”

Alice: …but ever since you had kids, you’ve been really good about acknowledging birthdays. LOL

Jane: What – are you saying that all of those cross country trips I made to visit your little angel counted for nothing? :)

Alice: OMG! We SOOO appreciated that – of course we did. I just meant that becoming a mom has made you a bit more aware of the whole kid birthday thing and how important it is to them. You know we think you’re the best aunt ever! xoxo

Jane: MWAH! You know I love you too. And I know how forgetful you can be sometimes… LOL! Because there was only one time that I didn’t send a gift, and that was because I was unemployed and kinda living hand to mouth – and since you guys are just so sweet and supportive, I just knew that you’d understand. :)

Alice: LOL – I think YOU are the one who is a bit forgetful… Because there were several years that we barely heard from you at all and it had nothing to do with work. I believe that there was a mystery man involved (tee hee) – not that we’d know since you didn’t return phone calls. :D

Jane: Oh for christ’s sake Alice – he was like a year old. I seriously doubt that he even noticed the presents he DID get. And if you actually had a life outside of your Stepford bubble, then you might see that as cute as he is, he’s actually NOT the center of everyone’s universe. But give him a kiss from from his auntie ‘kay! :)

Alice: God, you’re selfish. Talk about the universe revolving around someone! We all have to completely rearrange our schedules whenever you come into town. And now that you’ve had a baby? It’s like you think you invented motherhood! But really it’s been too long – you have to plan another trip out here soon! xoxo

Jane: You are such a bitch. LOL

Alice: You’re a bigger one. :D

Jane: LOLOLOL #&$*%$#&$ :):):):)

Alice: :D:D:D:D #$&%#&&%$#$* xoxoxoxo

So yeah – I think we need to tread lightly with the symbols and just say what we mean as plainly as possible. It might take a few extra minutes, but at least we’ll all be on the same page. :-)

Comfort and Whimsy

Since I’m combing the Internet for little pictures to inspire my own scribbling, I am immediately drawn to pretty little pictures created by “real” artists.

Chelsea of {frolic!} recently featured the watercolor illustrations of Bella Foster, and I was quite taken with them.

Particularly these interiors:

 

The scenes are so everyday and approachable but her interpretation is so dreamy. It’s a fanciful combination and very unique. Just lovely.

So What do you Think?

I just posted something about this on The Big Piece of Cake, and thought it was well suited to this site as well.

I haven’t done anything in the way of artwork since school, but last week, out of the blue, decided to buy myself a set of pastels and give it a try.

Here is my first try (technically second – but you’ll have to see my other post for full details).

I selected this lovely image from Absolutely Beautiful Things:


And then tried to capture it on paper:


Not too shabby for a first attempt… Of course in light of the caliber of my creations from 20 years ago, it probably won’t get much better than this. I’m not a real artist – but it sure is fun!

How about you? Do you play artist, poet or musician – just for fun?

And Now, for Something Completely Uncontroversial

I’m not usually one to pick “hot topics” for my posts. So declaring for the MJ is a child molester camp was a bit bold for The Big Piece of Cake. Particularly since I do waver a bit on the subject. But hey – I wrote it, so it’s now out there. (Do you think it’s a coincidence that I seem to have lost some readers? Yikes.)

Anyway – in honor of my cowardly nature and fear of hate mail, I’m going to take a completely different direction today and tell you something very warm and fuzzy. Rainbows and unicorns all the way – I promise.

Very few people who have met me since I graduated college would know this, but I used to be somewhat of an art chick. Not in the multiple piercings, moody, poetry writing kind of way though. More in the prissy little girl creating pretty little pictures kind of way. I was never destined to be a real artist, like my brother. But I did really enjoy whipping up those pretty little pictures.

For some reason, I was never any good with paint – I always ended up with a big wet mess on the canvas. And my hobbyist attitude didn’t engender the dedication required for mastering that medium. Instead I found my comfort zone with pastels. They’re like crayons for adults. And even better because you can smear them around to correct mistakes.

Once I graduated from college I lost interest in art classes and it’s not like my roommates and I ever sat around crafting together (it was the mid ’90s, and for me the word “craft” conjured up images of old ladies with knitting bags or acrylic nailed DIY enthusiasts with Bedazzlers).

So no more art.

Until last week.

Don’t know what inspired me, but I was at Michael’s trying to find supplies for kid craft projects that my children wouldn’t eat or smear on the walls (easier said than done, I may add). Anyway, I saw a package of charcoal pastels and had a flashback of a life drawing class. Then I looked at the color pastels and thought “maybe…”

I bought both oil pastels (because I had never used them before and was curious) and soft (chalk) pastels. And when my kids went to bed that night, I sat down to see if I still had the touch (if touch means the ability to smear colors on paper to somewhat represent the image I was trying to capture).

I started with the oil pastels. Here is the image I used:


And here is my drawing:


Not that great (and my photography is terrible), but I found the oil pastels really hard to work with. I think they require a bit more precision… I won’t give up on them, but I put them aside for a second try with the good old soft pastels I once knew so well.

This is the image I used:


And here is my drawing:


Big improvement. And pretty! I’m not quitting my day job any time soon (oh wait a minute – I actually DID quit my day job – just not to become an artist). But I will definitely have fun with this.

And isn’t that what hobbies are all about?

What about you? Any childhood pastimes that you’ve recently picked up again?

1. Origin unknown – SORRY, let me know if it’s yours
2. Absolutely Beautiful Things (of course)

Wishing Really, Really Hard for…


I SOOOO want one of these beautiful dolls from Du Buh Du.

I was hoping to win the drawing she held last week – but alas, my name wasn’t picked.

If I could have chosen one it would be:

Basilde

or

SalomeOkay – or

Trilby
It’s so hard to pick. No funds to purchase one from her Etsy shop on Thursday, and something tells me that they will disappear in seconds anyway – but I can certainly dream. And wish…

Why I Think Michael Jackson Was Guilty As Charged

Today is Michael Jackson’s memorial service, and there were some morning commute music block tributes on the radio. I enjoyed this immensely and rocked out to Shake Your Body (Down to the Ground), P.Y.T. and Dirty Diana.

But it also made me think about him and his very weird, sad life. I’ve avoided saying anything about his death since I do have some pretty serious thoughts on his life. And it’s not like I’m a newscaster here. I’m not reporting world events (because to people like me who consider reading US Weekly, “catching up on the news,” Michael Jackson’s death is a major world event).

So I haven’t considered writing about it. Until this morning when I was picturing him singing Shake Your Body and then P.Y.T. and then…what happened to him!?

Back to my rather harsh judgement (or opinion really, since I didn’t know him personally and am not in a position to judge – have I missed any disclaimers?)

We’ve all heard that saying, “If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck…”* And at the end of the day, COME ON! There are WAY too many variables going on here for MJ to be completely and perfectly innocent of the child molestation accusations.

If you still think that’s not quite fair, I’ll give you a “duck” example from my own life.

At my last job as a conference planner, I met a man who worked for…oh, let’s say DHS (it was a different office, but I’m all about protecting privacy here – for non-celebrities I mean). I was walking our Annual Expo show floor with a co-worker who knew him, and stopped with her so they could chat.

Since I wasn’t part of the conversation, I had a little time to just observe. He was very handsome and impeccably dressed. His obviously groomed eyebrows were still subtle, so only a woman would be likely to notice. He looked to be in his 30s, but the flat stomach and broad shoulders could easily have walked off a college lacrosse field.

When I came to from this daze of admiration for such a fine specimen of a man, I realized that he was talking about (or more accurately gushing about) his niece and nephew.

So let’s see…beautiful Canali suit, perfect hair and eyebrows, rock hard work out body AND routinely chats about his niece and nephew…yeah – he’s gay.

As we walked away, my friend commented on how gorgeous he was and how she always felt so nervous talking to him – with the raging crush and all. And of course, I said something to the effect of it being too bad for her that he was gay.

And OF COURSE she was incredulous as to why I would think that, and doubted my expertise on the matter. Which is fair enough – because I’m certainly not an expert. I just see a duck who quacks like a duck and form my own conclusions. While no single one of my observations would make me assume that he was gay, all of them together created a rather flaming red flag.

Epilogue: A year later after returning from an international conference where delegates usually brought their spouses, that same co-worker dragged me into an office to tell me that – what do you know – I was right. Mr. Gorgeous arrived on site with his life partner (and a wallet full of pictures featuring the niece and nephew).

Integrity of Kate’s gaydar: 1. Naysayers: 0.**

I would apply this same line of thinking to Michael Jackson being accused of molesting young boys. Let’s review the facts:

  1. He had no childhood and an physically abusive father.
  2. He was a child star in an industry where plentiful drugs and loose morals were a given.
  3. He was the darling of said industry and exposed to who knows how many people with said priorities.
  4. Sexual predators are everywhere and a child like Michael Jackson would be an easy target for the adults populating his life (admittedly, this is conjecture – but still quite probable).
  5. He changed his appearance so many times that by the end he was barely human looking.
  6. He had high profile romantic relationships with female celebrities, also known for being somewhat damaged.
  7. No one ever really bought these romances which had the distinct air of being more friendship based and possibly just for show (more conjecture – but tell me you didn’t think the same thing).
  8. He had his first two children with a woman who relinquished all rights as a mother, so I’m going to say there was no romantic relationship there.
  9. Those children do not look like their father would likely be a black man (or at least not 100%) and the possibility of all three looking so Caucasian is pretty slim (if this statement offends you – pull out your old high school biology text book and read about dominant genes).
  10. Before even becoming a father, he built an estate called Neverland that would be a fantasy home for children (the child he never got to be).
  11. He had the monkey thing.
  12. He had the Liz and Liza thing.
  13. I could go on and on but the big, bottom line is that he had children, including 12 year old boys sleep over. In his own bed.

Each one of those items is not in and of itself condemning, but all together? It doesn’t sound like this was a man who was able to have normal romantic relationships with women. It does sound like a very sad, damaged person who made some bad choices. And it does sound like a very good candidate for pedophilia.

Again – I’m no expert, so maybe I’m wrong. But when you invite 12 year old boys into the your bed, you kind give up your right to being given the benefit of the doubt.

And on the possibility that he was in fact a sex offender who was able to buy his way out of jail, I wonder how those children, now adults, feel today. Are they rocking out in their car to P.Y.T.? Are they just happy it’s over? Are they in a good place now and able to forgive? That’s their story. One that fell off the radar long ago. And it’s probably for the best since they would at the very least deserve a chance for a normal life now.

I can’t judge Michael Jackson, but I can consider him. I can have pity for the child he never got to be, but also have contempt for the man he chose to be. And I can love the music in spite of the man. My personal opinion can waver on the details and find firmer ground in the big picture. But none of it makes any difference.

Do I think people should be held accountable for their actions? Yes. But after they’re dead? I don’t know… Because that really doesn’t make a difference either. Those of use who are living have a future and when we do look back at the past, we’ll all see different things.

Some will chose to see only the good, and some will choose to see only the bad. But both are there to be seen and considered. And in the end, I choose to see it all. With wide open eyes, and dancing feet.

*I Googled this saying since I wasn’t sure if it was “quacks” or “walks” and discovered that it’s actually a quote from Douglas Adams. And a pretty witty one at that: “If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.” I may have known this once – but I don’t tend to retain factoids or information that isn’t relative to my life experience. So sorry Douglas – you just didn’t make the cut.

**Why do I keep talking about gay men on my blog…? I don’t even have that many gay friends now that I live in the burbs and lost touch with most of the hospitality industry contacts from my meeting planning days. Too bad I don’t live in the city anymore – I obviously have some serious fag hag potential going on over here…

LWD

We hear about LBD (Little Black Dress) all the time, but I personally have a thing for the LWD: the Little White Desk.

Whether it’s distressed and beachy looking or frilled dressing tabled out – I just love them.

So of course, this little number featured on Apartment Therapy caught my eye:


Minimalists and girly girls alike should find this sigh-worthy.

Your Identity in Two Paragraphs or Less

Remember when I decided to embrace my mommy blogger identity? No? Well, it was a long time ago… But one of the things I said was that I was going to see if I could join DC Metro Moms [DC Metro Moms closed shop July 1, 2010 – all posts are now on this site] and make it official.

They’re just now accepting new bloggers, so I’m in! AND I have my first post up today, titled “Your Identity in Two Paragraphs or Less.” Actually, the title is a bit longer because it’s a rule that you have to put something in the title indicating what the post is about. Something about search engines I think…can’t remember…I was too exhausted by figuring out TypePad to do more than skim that part of the instructions.

And now that I think of it, that title is incredibly misleading. It may appear the I will actually attempt to sum up my identity in two paragraphs [insert image of me languidly throwing back my head in a peal of world weary laughter here]. Like THAT would ever happen. No, it’s the opposite – I ramble on about how impossible that is for me.

BUT it’s not just my usual long-winded hooey (I don’t think I’ve ever written “hooey” before – is that even a word?) There is also a rather shocking “big reveal” in there. Unless of course, you are an IRL friend who already knows my big news…and unless you think “shocking” implies something as sensational as say, the revelation that there is a major swingers community in your neighborhood. Actually that probably is more exciting than my news – but I think you catch my drift – I announce something in that post that is big news for me.

So go visit me at DC Metro Moms today – I’m not sure how many people will be online over a holiday weekend…but if you are, check it out. And please comment so the other Metro Moms don’t think I’m a loser. It’s so hard being the new girl…

Mondrian Cake

Anyone who reads my personal blog knows that I LOVE cake. So after reading this on Cry It Out, I decided that I may need to move to San Francisco.At least for the duration of Cake Walk at SFMOMA (Cry It Out writer feature here).

How cool is this?

image from Cry It Out

Chris and I just agreed that if we win the lottery we will be moving to San Francisco.

Smithsonian – I love you, but unless you step it up and start producing art inspired pastry, I may need to defect.